On June 15, 2020, the Supreme People's Court of China (the “SPC”) issued Provisions on Evidence in Intellectual Property Civil Procedures (Exposure Draft) (the “Provisions”) and Opinions on Enhanced Sanctions on Intellectual Property Infringements (Exposure Draft) (the “Opinions”). These two exposure drafts aim at further strengthening the judicial protection of intellectual property ("IP") and promoting new developments in the Chinese judicial protection system. Below we will brief on the highlights in the two exposure drafts.
Increased Protection of Trade Secrets
The increased protection of trade secrets is the most prominent development in the two exposure drafts.
In trade secret cases, the risk of second leakage is not unusual because confidential requirements are missing in procedures like evidence exchange, cross-examination, and court hearing. The Provisions formulates several rules to minimize such risk:
The Opinions, on the other hand, provides that in the criminal cases where the trade secret is infringed on behalf of foreign entities, organizations or people, a heavier sanction shall be imposed (Para.20).
Ease the Restrictions on Foreign Evidence
Under current Chinese civil procedures, the foreign evidence, before submitting to the Court, it has to be notarized where the evidence was formed or comply with related legalization procedures. To respond to the practical needs of judicial protection for IP rights, the Provisions eases such restrictions to some extent through Article 9 and 10.
These provisions avoid cumbersome procedural requirements and therefore offer greater convenience in foreign-related IP litigations.
Adjustments to Evidence Rules
The Provisions also makes adjustments to certain evidence rules in IP litigations.
IP Protection on “Hot Issues”
The Opinions emphasises the application of preliminary injunction in the litigations involving core technologies, well-known brands and hit shows, and the criminal sanctions against passing off the registered trademarks of commodities such as emergency rescue, disaster relief and epidemic prevention materials during specific periods These provisions were concluded by the judicial practice during the outbreak of COVID-19 since such “hot issues” usually attract widespread social attention and thus are easier to be infringed in the perspective of IP rights. Furthermore, the infringement usually will cause great loss to the right owners and could have a bad influence on society.
Before the Provisions and the Opinions were drafted and issued, the procedures applied in IP litigations did not differ from other civil litigations. We believe the two exposure drafts issued by the SPC release a signal that China will move on to a greater judicial protection against the IP infringement.
We are deeply shocked by the brutal and violent attack of the Russian Federation on the sovereignty of Ukraine and the human suffering it has already caused
Recently, the Guangdong Provincial High People's Court made a final judgment
In the wake of the developments concerning the COVID-19 / Coronavirus, BUREN has adjusted it’s policies to ensure that our services and responsiveness