On 7 December 2018 the long-awaited draft bill was issued for consultation on the power of the board of a listed company to invoke a reflection period. Under the proposed changes, in the event of a motion being tabled for a change of strategy or a hostile bid being made, the company's board would be able to invoke a reflection period. During the reflection period, the right of the general meeting to suspend and dismiss managing directors and supervisory directors would be suspended for a maximum of 250 days. The draft bill complies with the coalition agreement of the Rutte III cabinet, in which the reflection period was announced.
Reasons for introducing a reflection period
From the explanatory memorandum drawn up by the ministers, it can be concluded that, when influence is exerted on the strategy, the board of a listed company must have time and tranquillity in order to assess and weigh up the interests of the stakeholders involved in the company. Long-term value creation, as propagated by the Dutch corporate governance code, is central. According to the explanatory memorandum, the reflection period fits within the scope of the shareholders' rights directive and the takeover directive (both in Dutch) and there are arguments supporting the view that the reflection period cannot be regarded as an obstacle to the freedom of establishment nor to the free movement of capital.
Primacy of the board's strategy
The primacy of the board with respect to the strategy is made explicit in the law. In fact, this is a codification of a number of rulings handed down by the Dutch Supreme Court (ABN AMRO, ASMI and Fugro/Boskalis).
Invoking the reflection period
According to the draft bill, the reflection period could be invoked in three situations:
The reflection period would last a maximum of 250 days, during which the right of the general meeting to suspend and dismiss managing directors and supervisory directors would be suspended. The idea is that careful dialogue takes place between the board of the company and the stakeholders during the reflection period. The stakeholders include in any case shareholders with an interest of at least 3% and the works council.
The preliminary draft contains a number of safeguards to prevent the reflection period being invoked without good reason:
Cumulation with other protective measures
From the explanatory notes to the preliminary draft, it follows that a company that has priority shares and/or protective preference shares may also invoke the reflection period. Cumulation of protective measures would therefore be possible. This differs from earlier arrangements set out in the coalition agreement of the Dutch cabinet. It would be at the judge's discretion whether a combination of different protective measures in a specific situation would be permitted.
We expect the reflection period to be used mainly by listed companies that do not have protection in place or do not have a major shareholder. That is a small group of listed companies.
The consultation ends on 7 February 2019, after which a legislative bill will probably be drawn up. It is expected that the new statutory regulation will enter into force at the earliest at the end of 2019.
On the 25th of April we were honored and proud to have welcomed a delegation of the Ministry of Justice headed
On Thursday March 21st, Ivan Gu was one of 4 speakers at the Agri and Horticulture Seminar organized by the RVO
This week, the IBA, the largest annual international conference for legal professionals, is taking place in Rome. This year Buren hosted again a private event.